Tuesday, 21 June 2011

The Beautiful Moth

ONE pleasant evening a moth flew into a plush restaurant. As it fluttered by her table, a lady dining there frantically shooed the moth away as if she were being attacked by a disease-laden mosquito! The moth proceeded to another table, finally alighting on a man's lapel. This man and his wife had an entirely different reaction—they admired the moth, reflecting on the beauty and harmlessness of this delicate creature.

"Moths are about as harmless as a creature can get," explains John Himmelman, cofounder of the Connecticut Butterfly Association. "They have no biting mouth parts, and some adults, such as the well-known luna moth, don't eat at all. They don't carry rabies or any other diseases, they don't sting . . . In fact, most people don't realize that butterflies are actually day-flying moths."

Everyone admires butterflies, but few stop to admire the beauty and variety of moths. 'Beauty?' you may say, skeptically. Some think of the moth as merely a lackluster cousin of the beautiful butterfly, yet both are given the same scientific classification—Lepidoptera, meaning "scaly wings." The wide variety observable among these lovely creatures is astounding. The Encyclopedia of Insects states that there are 150,000 to 200,000 known species of Lepidoptera. But of these, only 10 percent are butterflies—the rest are moths!

How Crops Survive Drought

Breakthrough research done earlier this year by a plant cell biologist at the University of California, Riverside has greatly accelerated scientists' knowledge on how plants and crops can survive difficult environmental conditions such as drought.
Working on abscisic acid (ABA), a stress hormone produced naturally by plants, Sean Cutler's laboratory showed in April 2009 how ABA helps plants survive by inhibiting their growth in times when water is unavailable -- research that has important agricultural implications.
The Cutler lab, with contributions from a team of international leaders in the field, showed that in drought conditions certain receptor proteins in plants perceive ABA, causing them to inhibit an enzyme called a phosphatase. The receptor protein is at the top of a signaling pathway in plants, functioning like a boss relaying orders to the team below that then executes particular decisions in the cell.
Now recent published studies show how those orders are relayed at the molecular level. ABA first binds to the receptor proteins. Like a series of standing dominoes that begins to knock over, this then alters signaling enzymes that, in turn, activate other proteins resulting, eventually, in the halting of plant growth and activation of other protective mechanisms.
"I believe Sean's discovery is the most significant finding in plant biology this year and will have profound effects on agriculture worldwide," said Natasha Raikhel, the director of UC Riverside's Center for Plant Cell Biology, of which Cutler is a member.

The Eye of the Peacock Mantis Shrip

The peacock mantis shrimp, found on
Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, is equipped
with the most complex eyesight in the animal
kingdom. “It really is exceptional,”
says Dr. Nicholas Roberts, “outperforming
anything we humans have so far been
able to create.”

Consider: The peacock mantis shrimp
can perceive polarized light and process it
in ways that humans cannot do. Polarized
light waves may travel along a straight
line or rotate in a corkscrew motion. Unlike
other creatures, this mantis shrimp
not only sees polarized light in both its
straight-line and corkscrew forms but is
also able to convert the light from the one
form to the other. This gives the shrimp
enhanced vision.

DVD players work in a similar way. To
process information, the DVD player must
convert polarized light aimed at a disc
into a corkscrew motion and then change
it back into a straight-line format. But the
peacock mantis shrimp goes a step further.

While a standard DVD player only
converts red light—or in higher-resolution
players, blue light—the shrimp’s eye can
convert light in all colors of the visible
spectrum.

WAS IT DESIGNED?


Biology of Sharks and Rays

Like other sharks, the Great White is a biological "swimming machine", sculpted by evolution to utilize the properties of water with elegant efficiency. Everything about the White Shark's body shape is stripped-down and fine-tuned to optimize its swimming efficiency in a way that is appropriate for its active lifestyle.

Swimming style and body form are intimately linked. The White Shark combines a solidly-built, torpedo-shaped body, a narrow tail stalk supported by lateral keels, and a crescent moon-shaped caudal fin. This body form — shared by the Great White and its lamnid relatives, the makos and porbeagles — is noticeably different from that of a so-called 'typical' shark and, not surprisingly, these sharks employ a distinctly different swimming style. Unlike the graceful, nearly whole-bodied swimming stroke used by a typical whaler shark (family Carcharhinidae), the lamnids swim in a relatively stiff-bodied, almost 'militaristic' fashion. Each swim stroke involves arching the body laterally into a shallow curve, with the amplitude increasing from very small — at the head and anterior two-thirds of the body — to large — at the posterior edge of the caudal fin. By oscillating the body from side-to-side in this fashion, tremendous swimming speeds can be achieved with remarkable energy economy. This stiff-bodied swimming style is simply the most energy-efficient for a fish with the same general build as a White Shark. Thus, jacks, tunas, billfishes, swordfish, and lamnid sharks have independently evolved a similar body form and swimming style. But this high-speed swimming style comes with a hefty price: significant loss of maneuverability.
Comparison of Red Muscle in Lamna, Isurus, and Carcharodon. Note that the extent of Red muscle is inversely proportional to the 'stiffness' of the shark's propulsive stroke. A diagram for my field / laboratory notebook, 1987.
Not all lamnid sharks employ stiff-bodied swimming in precisely the same way. Among lamnids, the very stout-bodied Porbeagle (Lamna nasus) and Salmon Shark (Lamna ditropis) swim the most stiffly, flexing little more than the tail back-and-forth in a rather clunky manner, resembling the motion of a mechanical toy that had been wound up and let go. The sleek Shortfin Mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) swims rather less stiffly, flexing most of the posterior half of its body to generate propulsive strokes. Employing the posterior two-thirds of its body in each propulsive stroke, the moderately stocky White Shark is by far the most graceful swimmer among lamnids. Since the Porbeagle and Salmon Sharks each have a length-to-width ratio closer to 4.5 than any other lamnoid, it is not surprising that they swim in the stiff-bodied style that is close to ideal for their shape. But, if body shape were the only factor that mattered, on the basis of its form, we would predict that the Shortfin Mako — not the White Shark — would employ a swimming stroke that is least stiff-bodied.

Like other sharks, the Great White's swimming muscles are primarily of the type known as "white muscle". But, as with its lamnid relatives and a few other sharks, the White Shark also possess a band of dark "red muscle" that runs along the flanks just under the skin. Red muscle has substantially greater stamina than white. From opportunistic dissections of Porbeagle, Salmon, Shortfin Mako, and White Sharks, I have noted that the length of this band of dark muscle varies considerably among the various genera. Porbeagle and Salmon Sharks (genus Lamna) typically have a very short band of red muscle along their flanks, the Shortfin Mako's (Isurus) are somewhat longer, and those of the White Shark (Carcharodon) longest of all. Given red muscles' stamina, the White Shark's less stiff-bodied swimming style compared with other lamnids may be due to the fact that it has the most extensive band of red muscle along its flanks.

This marriage between muscle form and swimming function may result in significant advantages to the White Shark. If the benefits of stiff-bodied swimming comes at the cost of reduced maneuverability, the development of a more sinuous propulsive stroke may partially off-set that loss. As such, the White Shark may be more maneuverable than its lamnid cousins. This ability, in turn, may lead to predatory advantages when pursuing such swift and agile prey as seals and sea lions. If this is true, the Great White has struck a highly beneficial compromise between the limitations of its body form and the adaptability of its red muscle band.
[As appeared in the magazine Awake!, November 2010]